The Best Age to Claim Social Security: What’s Right for You?

One of the most important retirement decisions you will make has nothing to do with picking a stock, choosing a mutual fund, or deciding whether you can finally afford that trip you have been talking about for five years.

It is deciding when to claim Social Security.

You can start collecting retirement benefits as early as age 62, or you can claim at your full retirement age and receive 100% of your scheduled benefit. Indeed you can even wait beyond full retirement age and increase your monthly benefit until age 70. For someone born in 1960 or later, full retirement age is 67, and waiting until 70 produces a benefit equal to 124% of the full retirement benefit. (Social Security Administration)

That sounds simple enough, but it isn’t for most people.

I have found that Social Security claiming decisions become much easier when I stop asking, “What is the best age to claim?” and start asking, “What is the best age for this particular person?”

Those are two very different questions.

Your health, life expectancy, marital situation, retirement savings, tax situation, need for income, attitude toward risk, and even your personality can influence the answer. A financially comfortable 62-year-old in excellent health may have a very different optimal strategy from a 62-year-old with significant health problems and limited savings.

There is no prize for waiting until 70 if doing so makes your retirement miserable. There is also no prize for claiming at 62 simply because you can.

The goal is to make Social Security work for your retirement, rather than allowing Social Security to make the decision for you.

Why Age 62 Is Not Automatically the Best Time to Claim Social Security

Age 62 has an obvious attraction. You qualify for retirement benefits, money starts arriving, and you get to keep more of your own money rather than waiting around for Uncle Sam to send it to you.

I understand the appeal.

For some retirees, claiming at 62 is completely reasonable. If you have health problems that could shorten your life expectancy, need the income to cover basic expenses, have little retirement savings, or simply place a high value on enjoying your money while you are younger, taking benefits early can make sense.

The problem comes when someone claims at 62 without understanding what they are giving up.

If your full retirement age is 67, claiming at 62 can reduce your retirement benefit by as much as 30%. That reduction generally remains in place for life. (Social Security Administration)

That is a substantial tradeoff.

Suppose your full retirement benefit would be $2,500 per month. A 30% reduction would leave you with roughly $1,750 per month. Waiting until 70, under current rules for someone with a full retirement age of 67, would produce roughly $3,100 per month before future cost-of-living adjustments.

That difference continues every month for the rest of your retirement.

The person claiming at 62 receives five additional years of checks, while the person waiting until 70 eventually receives substantially larger checks. The question is not simply which person gets more money. The real question is when the larger lifetime income becomes more valuable than the earlier payments.

That is where your personal circumstances become important.

When Claiming Social Security at 62 May Make Sense

I would seriously consider claiming early if a retiree has significant health problems or a strong reason to believe he or she will not live into the 80s or beyond.

Social Security is insurance against living a long life, but you cannot collect decades of benefits if you die relatively young. Someone with a serious illness may reasonably decide that taking the money sooner has greater value.

Your financial situation matters, too.

If Social Security represents a large portion of your retirement income and you cannot comfortably pay your bills without it, waiting several years may create unnecessary financial stress. Drawing down retirement savings aggressively just to postpone Social Security is not automatically a winning strategy.

There is also a psychological component that gets overlooked in financial planning.

Some retirees simply want to start enjoying their money. They may have worked for 40 years, saved responsibly, and reached their sixties with a strong desire to travel, spend time with family, pursue hobbies, or simply stop worrying about every dollar.

I don’t think that motivation should be dismissed.

Money has a purpose. If receiving Social Security at 62 allows you to enjoy an active retirement while you are healthy enough to do the things you want, that has real value.

The mistake is assuming that everyone’s situation looks the same.

Why Full Retirement Age Can Be the Middle Ground

For many retirees, full retirement age represents a reasonable compromise.

You avoid the permanent reduction associated with claiming early, while you also avoid waiting until 70 to receive benefits.

For people born in 1960 or later, full retirement age is 67. For earlier birth years, the age varies. (Social Security Administration)

Claiming at full retirement age can make particular sense if you are healthy but need the income, have enough assets to avoid claiming at 62, yet do not want to spend several more years waiting for Social Security.

It can also make sense if your retirement plan already provides enough guaranteed income and you have no compelling reason to maximize your Social Security benefit.

I would not automatically assume that 70 is superior simply because the monthly check is larger. A larger check is useful, but it is not free.

You give up years of benefits to get it.

Why Waiting Until 70 Can Be a Powerful Retirement Strategy

For a healthy person with adequate retirement assets, waiting until 70 can be one of the strongest ways to create more guaranteed lifetime income.

Social Security increases your benefit for every month you delay after full retirement age, up to age 70. For people born in 1943 or later, the delayed retirement credit is generally 8% per year. There is no additional increase for waiting beyond age 70. (Social Security Administration)

For someone with a full retirement age of 67, that means waiting from 67 to 70 can increase the benefit by 24%.

That is a substantial increase in guaranteed monthly income.

I particularly like the strategy for retirees who have other assets they can use during their sixties. A person might live on cash, taxable investments, retirement accounts, part-time income, or a combination of these resources while allowing Social Security to grow.

The strategy effectively uses your portfolio to bridge the gap until you receive a larger guaranteed income stream.

There is an important psychological benefit, too.

Once you reach 70 and begin collecting a larger Social Security benefit, you have reduced the amount of money you need to generate from investments every month. That can make a retirement portfolio easier to manage during market downturns.

Imagine retiring at 65 with a $1 million portfolio.

If you need $60,000 a year from investments because you delayed Social Security, a major bear market could create considerable anxiety. If you eventually have $40,000 or $50,000 a year of Social Security income instead, your portfolio may have to carry less of the burden.

That can change how you behave during the next market crash, which may be just as important as the math.

Your Health May Be the Biggest Factor

When I think about Social Security claiming decisions, longevity is one of the first questions I consider.

If you are healthy, active, have good family longevity, and expect to live well into your eighties or nineties, delaying Social Security becomes more attractive.

You are essentially buying a larger stream of income for a potentially long retirement.

If your health is poor, the equation changes, sometimes drastically.

Someone facing serious health problems may reasonably place more value on receiving benefits earlier. The same strategy that works beautifully for a healthy 62-year-old may make little sense for someone with a significantly reduced life expectancy.

This is why I am cautious about simplistic advice such as “Everyone should wait until 70.”

Everyone should not wait until 70.

A healthy 68-year-old with substantial savings and parents who lived into their nineties may have a compelling reason to wait.

A 62-year-old with significant health problems and little retirement income may have an equally compelling reason to claim.

Retirement planning should reflect the human being sitting at the kitchen table, not just the spreadsheet.

Married Couples Have Another Layer to Consider

If you are married, Social Security becomes a two-person decision.

One of the biggest mistakes I see is when each spouse evaluates his or her benefit independently. Couples should also consider how their claiming decisions interact.

The higher earner’s claiming age can be especially important because survivor benefits can become part of the equation. A surviving spouse may receive benefits based on the deceased worker’s record, subject to Social Security’s rules.

That means delaying the higher earner’s benefit can potentially increase the income available to the surviving spouse later in life.

This becomes particularly important when there is a large difference between the spouses’ earnings records.

A couple should ask a bigger question than, “When should I claim?”

The better question is, “How can we coordinate both benefits to provide the strongest income throughout both of our lives and the survivor’s life?”

Social Security’s rules around spouses, deemed filing, and voluntary suspension can also be complicated. For people who turned 62 after January 1, 2016, deemed filing generally means that when they apply for retirement benefits, they also file for any spousal benefits for which they are eligible. (Social Security Administration)

This is one area where getting personalized advice before filing can be worth the money.

Your Retirement Savings Can Change the Answer

Your investment portfolio also matters.

Someone with $100,000 in retirement savings and someone with $2 million should not necessarily make the same Social Security decision.

A retiree with substantial assets may be able to delay Social Security comfortably and allow the benefit to grow. However, a retiree with limited assets may need the income earlier.

There is another issue I think retirees should consider. If you can afford to delay Social Security, where will the money come from during those years?

Selling investments during a severe bear market can create sequence-of-returns risk. On the other hand, using some assets during your sixties while allowing Social Security to grow may produce a more balanced retirement income strategy.

The right answer depends on the size and type of your portfolio, your withdrawal rate, taxes, and your other income sources.

This is where retirement planning becomes more interesting than simply circling an age on a calendar.

Taxes Matter More Than Many Retirees Realize

Social Security is also part of your tax picture.

Your claiming decision should be considered alongside withdrawals from traditional IRAs and 401(k)s, Roth conversions, pensions, investment income, and required minimum distributions.

A retiree might deliberately delay Social Security while making strategic withdrawals or Roth conversions during lower-income years. That could potentially change the tax picture later in retirement.

The reverse can also happen.

Taking Social Security early while simultaneously withdrawing large amounts from tax-deferred accounts may produce a different taxable-income profile.

There is no universal answer because tax planning depends heavily on your income, filing status, state, deductions, account balances, and future withdrawals.

I would never make a Social Security decision without looking at the tax consequences of the entire retirement income plan.

The Break-Even Age Is Useful, But It Is Not the Whole Story

You will often hear about the Social Security “break-even age.”

The concept is simple. If you claim early, you receive more years of smaller payments. If you wait, you receive fewer years of larger payments. At some point, the cumulative amount received by the person who delayed catches up with the person who claimed early.

That calculation can be useful.

It should not become your entire decision.

Break-even analysis ignores many of the things that actually matter in retirement. It does not fully capture investment returns, taxes, inflation, health, survivor benefits, portfolio withdrawals, or the psychological value of having more guaranteed income later in life.

It also treats every dollar as though it has the same value at every age. I don’t believe that is realistic.

A dollar received at 63 can have a different value to you than a dollar received at 83. You might be traveling at 63, helping children or grandchildren, renovating your home, or simply enjoying a level of physical activity that becomes harder later.

Your personal utility of money changes as you age.

The Best Social Security Claiming Age May Change With Your Priorities

Retirement is not one long, uniform stage of life.

Your sixties can look very different from your seventies. Your seventies can look very different from your eighties.

That matters when deciding when to claim Social Security.

If you have plenty of energy at 62 and want to travel extensively, receiving more income earlier may have value. However, if you are financially comfortable but concerned about running out of money at 90, maximizing guaranteed income later may matter more.

That is one reason I like to think about retirement in phases rather than treating age 65 as some magical doorway into a completely predictable future.

Your spending, health, relationships, and priorities will change, your Social Security strategy should fit into that larger picture.

So, What Is the Best Age to Claim Social Security?

After looking at the numbers and the personal circumstances, my answer is simple.

The best age to claim Social Security is the age that best fits your health, longevity expectations, financial resources, family situation, tax strategy, and personal priorities.

Claiming at 62 can make sense when health, cash-flow needs, or personal priorities favor early income.

But claiming at full retirement age can provide a sensible middle ground for people who want their full scheduled benefit without waiting until 70.

Waiting until 70 can be particularly attractive for healthy retirees with adequate assets who want to maximize guaranteed lifetime income and reduce the financial pressure on their investment portfolio later in life.

I would also avoid making the decision based on fear.

Some people claim early because they worry Social Security will disappear. Others delay because they believe waiting is always financially superior.

Neither approach represents good retirement planning.

Social Security remains a major source of retirement income for millions of Americans, but your personal strategy should account for the rules currently in effect and your own financial circumstances.

Before filing, I would create three retirement-income scenarios: claiming at 62, claiming at full retirement age, and claiming at 70. Then I would compare the monthly income, portfolio withdrawals, taxes, survivor implications, and estimated lifetime cash flow under each scenario.

The Social Security Administration also provides personalized benefit estimates through a my Social Security account, which can help you compare claiming ages using your own earnings record. (Social Security Administration)

My Final Thoughts on Claiming Social Security

Most importantly, I would remember that retirement planning is not a contest to see who can squeeze the most dollars out of Social Security.

The purpose is to build a retirement that supports the life you actually want to live.

Sometimes that means taking the money at 62, and sometimes it means waiting until 70. For many people, the answer falls somewhere in between.

The smartest decision is the one you can explain in one sentence: “I chose this claiming age because it fits my health, my money, my family, and the retirement I want.”

That is a much better retirement strategy than simply following whatever age your neighbor chose.

Especially if your neighbor is the guy who thinks cryptocurrency is a retirement plan.

Don’t wait until it’s too late, get your financial house in order today!

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FL48GP3F